| |
Peter Bradshaw, Friday September 2, 2005, The Guardian
: Original
Review
Just in time for the 60th anniversary of VJ Day comes
Aleksandr Sokurov's new film: a mesmerisingly mad, brilliantly
intuitive study of Emperor Hirohito and his Götterdämmerung
in the days after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as he is summoned
to make an unthinkably humiliating account of himself
by General Douglas MacArthur. It is the last panel in
Sokurov's triptych of 20th-century despots - the first
two being Moloch (1999), about Hitler, and Taurus (2001),
about Lenin - but this, it seems to me, is the tragicomic
masterpiece of the three, and certainly superior to his
recent, unrewarding movie Father and Son.
The Sun shows the living god who emerges blinking into
the scorched, radioactive daylight of the modern world
and decides he must commit the act of hara-kiri appropriate
on Mount Olympus: renounce his divinity and become a man.
Oliver Hirschbiegel's Downfall was accused of leniency
to the Führer in his bunker; Sokurov's Hirohito is
never sympathetic exactly - he is just too alienated,
too mysterious, the godhead who will never lower himself
to the ordinary human emotions consistent with defeat,
but must, through some superhuman effort of stoicism and
politesse, accommodate himself to the reality of placing
his head under America's yoke.
The emperor is the sun-god to his people, but over him
defeat has cast a mushroom cloud. Appropriately the movie
is shot throughout in crepuscular twilight, a sepia gloom
for interior shots and a truly strange bleached-out blankness
on the rare occasions when the emperor goes out of doors
- as if the shock of defeat and nuclear catastrophe had
leached all the natural light out of the world. It really
is a quite extraordinary visual effect, and for a long
time you watch it blinking, as if your eyes might eventually
become accustomed to this subdued light.
Sokurov is both cinematographer and director, and the
well-documented fact of his own failing eyesight must
of course make his admirers wonder if this effect is entirely
intentional. Maybe; maybe not. Common sense suggests that
this problem would make his films too bright. In any case,
the question itself for me lends its own aesthetic and
human poignancy to the work, a sense that the director
has found his own very personal, serendipitous access
to the idea of failure and the withdrawal of light.
The sound design is also a thing of wonder. Almost continually
under the dialogue, the score murmurs and crackles like
bad radio reception, and the effect is to make the film
look like a remembered nightmare or like images from another
planet. It murmurs like an unquiet spirit or like the
plumbing of a haunted house. With masterly control, Sokurov
orchestrates passages of Bach and, inevitably, Wagner,
rising and falling in the white noise of Japan's nuclear
winter.
The emperor and the American general are profoundly alien
to each other. Hirohito is played by Issei Ogata as part
gawkish boy, part sclerotic old man, his mouth continually
working in a palsied, neurotic tic, as if over ill-fitting
dentures. Clothed in a western-style morning suit with
tailcoat, top hat and owlish spectacles, he is forced
to dine with MacArthur (Robert Dawson), who is angry,
contemptuous, profoundly uncomprehending. They are like
two separate species, or even separate planetary forms.
The emperor is protected from the real world in his fortified
royal apartments, poring over his photo collection. He
gazes glumly at one shot of Hitler and Hindenburg, perhaps
realising that he personally embodies both Hitler's defeat
and Hindenburg's Ruritanian obsolescence and irrelevance.
Throughout Japan's disaster, he has been chiefly interested
in his hobby of marine biology research (a little like
George V's stamp collection) and he has vivid dreams of
Japanese cities being firebombed by malign airborne fishes.
His Darwinian convictions have been accelerated by defeat,
leading him to "evolutionary" views about Japan's
future modernity. The amateur geneticist in him senses
that the history of homo sapiens will be advanced by disaster,
by the comets and meteorites which will extinguish one
era and usher in another. Viewing this film 60 years after
its historical period, it is remarkable to think that
the Japanese are still alone in experiencing nuclear attack
and the evolutionary consequences it brings in its train.
A Tom Stoppard or a Ronald Harwood might well tell this
story differently on the stage, perhaps clarifying its
shape and putting brilliant speeches into the mouths of
Hirohito and MacArthur. Sokurov prefers a cloud of unknowing
and fear. Some might find the perpetual semi-darkness
a difficulty and some of the dialogue uneasy. But for
my money, even this is utterly appropriate. The Sun is
a film about a world that has lost its bearings, an existential
feeling of being unmoored from everything that had been
taken for granted, cut adrift in an outer space of strangeness.
Even its flaws - if they are flaws - are absorbing, and
there is something exhilarating in the traumatised irrationality
that Sokurov has somehow ingested into his creative procedure
as a film-maker. Everything is managed with incomparable
seriousness and grandeur.
Secrets of the emperor's bunker
JG Ballard applauds Alexander Sokurov's remarkable
film portrait of Hirohito
Tuesday September 13, 2005, The Guardian : Original
Review
Should the war against Japan ever have taken place? The
surprise attack on Pearl Harbour in December 1941 brought
a devastating response from the United States, and turned
the European war into a world-wide conflict. Sixty years
after Japan capitulated, the old soldiers have marched
past the Cenotaph, still proud and spry, but probably
for the last time. Few of them, sadly, will parade on
the 70th anniversary, though arguments about the end of
the Pacific war, and whether it was right to drop the
atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, will go on without
them.
The debate about the end of the war against Japan obscures
a more important question: why did the war begin in the
first place? Was it a gigantic blunder, triggered by decisions
made two years earlier by a British prime minister on
the far side of the globe?
This emphasis on ends rather than beginnings can be seen
in The Sun, a new film by Russian director Alexander Sokurov
(best known for the acclaimed Russian Ark), and the third
part in his tetralogy, following films about Hitler and
Lenin, depicting crucial moments in the lives of the 20th
century's most powerful men. Set in the immediate aftermath
of Japan's defeat, it describes the meetings between the
Emperor Hirohito and General Douglas MacArthur, the commander-in-chief
of the American occupying forces.
Sokurov is a noted documentary maker, and The Sun resembles
a dream-like newsreel filmed by a secret camera deep in
the emperor's bunker. We see Hirohito waited on by his
cringeing retainers, who dress and feed him as if he were
a handicapped child, which in effect he was. As he waits
for them to button his shirt, or murmurs to his marine
biology specimens in his private laboratory, he resembles
a royal figure rather closer to home: well-meaning, babied
by his wife and utterly disengaged from reality.
When the Pacific war drew to a close there were powerful
voices among the Allies who called for Hirohito to be
tried as a war criminal. But MacArthur feared this would
so humiliate the Japanese that it would be impossible
to maintain peace and guide the nation towards democracy.
Pedantic, dreamy, surprised by everything in the real
world, Hirohito grasps that a supreme gesture is called
for. In a bizarre but strangely moving moment, he informs
his dazed subjects that he is no longer a god. Everyone
is amazed; the madman has announced that he is no longer
Napoleon. Hirohito assures his courtiers that his body,
which we assume he has never closely inspected, is no
different from theirs. The gesture satisfies MacArthur,
and peace is secured. A few war criminals are hanged,
but democracy and a guilt-free nation can work to prepare
the world for the coming of the Sony Walkman. But why
did the war ever begin?
Hitler's determination to invade Russia was evident from
his first days in power. The expansion of the German peoples
to the east and the destruction of Bolshevism are constant
refrains in his speeches and writings. Germany could no
longer breathe in overcrowded Europe, and the only open
spaces lay in Poland and Russia. Nowhere does Hitler visualise
expanding to the west, of war with France, Britain, Denmark
and Holland. Hitler's invasion of Poland was his first
step towards the east and a Germanic empire stretching
to the Urals. Honouring their treaty commitments to Poland,
the British and French governments declared war on Germany,
but their armies were swiftly defeated in the field. German
bombers devastated Britain's cities, and the U-boat offensive
nearly starved the country into surrender. Poland received
no help from us, and the Nazis turned it into a gigantic
slaughterhouse.
Should Britain and France have stayed out of the war?
No, emphatically. But we should have declared war on Germany
only when we could win. By 1943, Hitler's forces were
being ground down by the Red Army, and we would have had
every chance of defeating the Germans in western Europe.
As someone who was so affected by our war with Japan,
I am more interested in the consequences of the British
government's misguided decision. Would Japan have attacked
Pearl Harbor, the most significant event of my life, if
Britain and France had not declared war on Germany in
1939? I suspect not. The attack was a desperate gamble
prompted by the American oil embargo, which would be lifted
only if the Japanese withdrew from China. The oil that
Japan eyed so eagerly was in the Dutch East Indies, but
deterred by a strong British, French and Dutch presence,
the Japanese might well have yielded to American demands
and withdrawn from China.
The Japanese tanks that I saw rolling into Shanghai on
the day of the attack might have been moving in the opposite
direction. The lives of millions of Chinese and Asians
would have been spared, along with thousands of British
soldiers in Burma and Singapore.
I would never have seen my father in a state of panic
and confusion when he burst into my bedroom and told me
to get dressed, adding (the most amazing thing I had ever
heard) that there would be no more school. I would never
have seen my mother endure the freezing winters in our
unheated concrete buildings in Lunghua Camp, where we
were interned. I would never have heeded the warnings
that I sensed deep inside my head, telling me that I would
have to look after myself, nature's most frightening alarm
call.
As it happened, our lives in Shanghai came to a sudden
end. During the years of internment I saw a great many
adults weakened by hunger and malaria, gradually losing
hope that the war would ever end. Parents in the camp
were unable to feed their children, protect them or even
keep them warm. Lunghua was in effect an enormous slum,
and as in any slum the teenage boys ran wild. Though I
was not aware of it, all this probably led to the estrangement
between my parents and myself that lasted all my life.
At the same time, I would never have become a hyperactive
adolescent, impatient with English life, who in middle
age began to wonder if his whole life had been a strange
and avoidable accident, prompted by a misguided British
prime minister and a Japanese emperor who was unable to
restrain his generals but believed that he was a god.
The Sun brilliantly sums up all the dilemmas that surround
war and peace. We see the great protagonists of world
war as individuals coming to terms with the differences
that separate their rival cultures; Hirohito and MacArthur
reveal their total incomprehension of each other. That
a final reconciliation was reached by one of them declaring
he was not a god, and that this was accepted by the other,
MacArthur, as a resolution that would guarantee peace
and democracy, is the great achievement at the heart of
this remarkable film.
Back
|
|