| |
Jonathan Curiel, San Francisco Chronicle: Original
Review
It's 1973, and Chile is undergoing a major upheaval pitting
the Marxist presidency of Salvador Allende against the
country's military and economic elite. This touching drama
uses that conflict as a backdrop to a story about two
boys -- one a child of privilege, the other of poverty
-- who become friends at a school run by a Marxist-oriented
priest.
The well-off student, named Gonzalo, is a studious, quiet,
red-haired, freckle-faced standout whose only blemish
seems to be his parents' troubling relationship. His mother
has disdain for Allende's policies and the poor people
who might benefit from them -- i.e., kids like Pedro Machuca,
who lives in a shantytown on the edge of Santiago. Through
the activism of the priest at Gonzalo's school, Pedro
-- a dark-skinned Indian -- becomes a student there.
The boys' friendship is a classic case of opposites
attracting. Gonzalo (played unforgettably by Matias Quer)
is drawn to Pedro's street smarts and to the way he survives
with so little. Gonzalo is also smitten with Pedro's friend
Silvana (Manuela Martel), a cute, fiery girl who dropped
out of school and now sells small flags to protesters
on the streets. Pedro (Ariel Mateluna) is taken by the
wealth of Gonzalo's home and by his new friend's access
to so many books, so much nice clothing and even an expensive
bike (that becomes an important symbol). The boys' relationship
gets more intense as the country's political temperature
rises and the lives of their parents become more polarized
by what is essentially a civil war.
Through the eyes of the children in Machuca, we see
how vulnerable life was for Chileans in 1973, when the
name Augusto Pinochet first became synonymous with military
repression. Director Andres Wood was an 8-year-old in
Santiago when Pinochet orchestrated his deadly coup. Wood
dedicates his film to the real-life priest who was the
basis for the film's religious figure. The bullying and
violence that Wood portrays is in contrast with the coming-of-age
moments that Pedro, Gonzalo and Silvana enjoy while Allende
is in power. Machuca isn't preachy. It's a sensitively
wrought work that reveals a time in Chile when class differences
were both ignored and emphasized, depending on your perspective.
Artificial Eye interview with Andrés Wood:
Original
Article
How did this project originate? Was it prompted solely
by your memories of childhood?
- The film has multiple origins. Initially, I was attracted
by an outline by one of the screenwriters on my previous
film, LA FIEBRE DEL LOCO (Loco Fever). It was set in 1978
and the protagonists were two teenagers, fans of the film
SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER and its music. When we discussed
the outline, I realised that we were approaching the project
from very different angles. It was my wife who made me
understand that I really wanted to make a film about my
high school experiences. I contacted Roberto Brodsky -
we had worked together on a television documentary about
that period - and then approached Mamoun Hassan. The screenplay
contains some of their own childhood memories.
You had already made two films before MACHUCA. Why
wait until your third feature to tackle this period?
- I couldn't say exactly. In my first two films, as in
MACHUCA, the themes came to me spontaneously. What I can
say, without the slightest doubt, is that we practice
a lot of self-censorship in our job. All the more so as
the country is still deeply divided by what happened in
1973 - it is not easy to make a film about those events.
In some respects, I don't think I was mature enough before.
I did not have a clear-cut opinion on what happened at
that time.
The film traces the stages of a political awareness forged
in the streets, on the battlefield, so to speak.
- Politics was a major part of daily life in the 70s and
80s. Everybody belonged to a party. Although I was very
young at the time, all that is still deeply rooted in
me.
Is the reaction of Gonzalo Infante typical of middle-class
kids of the time? Their ideas are progressive but they
are still conscious of their position in society.
- I don't think there is anything stereotypical about
Gonzalo. On the contrary, his behaviour is far from ordinary.
He gets on so well with Machuca because they have a lot
in common, although their political opinions are very
different.
The political background is often evoked through shots
of inscriptions: slogans on a wall, posters, press cuttings,
banners at a demonstration, etc.
- The film's background matches exactly the situation
we wanted to depict. We tried to evoke the period through
immediately perceptible elements, like the graffiti and
the posters, but we also give the viewer more subtle information
through the gestures and facial expressions of the protagonists.
The film operates at several levels but for me, the social
and political context is crucial.
One of the saddest scenes has to be the erasure of
the slogan 'No a la guerra civil' [No Civil War].
- It's something of a paradox: the communists wanted to
preserve democracy, while both their allies and their
enemies were looking for a confrontation. In a sense,
that makes the scene in which they discover that the smoke
from a fire has obliterated the word 'No' even sadder.
What about the American Marxist priest? Do you see
him as a total idealist?
- The real priest, the inspiration for Father MacEnroe,
did not really want us to portray him as a Marxist. He
was an idealist and frankly not pragmatic, but he was
an authentic hero, just as Allende was. Father Whelan
enabled me to write the character of Father MacEnroe.
Have you been strongly influenced by other directors
or films? Ken Loach, for example, or LLUEVE SOBRE SANTIAGO
(RAIN OVER SANTIAGO)?
- I admire many filmmakers, but this film is clearly influenced
by the work of François Truffaut and Louis Malle.
Beyond the obvious social divisions at the school,
there is also an ethnic divide between children of European
and indigenous Indian origin.
- There is a divide which stems from skin colour. But
the real gulf between the kids is essentially social and
financial.
There are lighter, more carefree moments in the film,
as when the two boys kiss a girl for the first time.
- When I started to look back over those years I realised
that despite the political troubles, we still had a sense
of freedom and happiness. I wanted to get that across
in the film.
The rising political tension and the regime change
are observed from the point of view of young Gonzalo,
so they are abstract factors for a time - until the plunge
into appalling violence.
- All the events in the film are observed from Gonzalo's
point of view. That gave us a lot of freedom to tell the
story, and even more scope to play on what was happening
off-screen. I think that is why many people find they
can relate to the story. We can all see something of ourselves
there, in one way or another.
How did you achieve the light and the colours that
evoke the 70s so well?
- We were determined to create an extremely realistic
atmosphere which, although harsh, would not lack warmth.
We used different materials, styles and colour schemes
for the sets. We also had lots of designer objects and
different kinds of music. We were tempted to give the
film a more radical '70s' style through the use of pop
music and hippy culture, but we felt that Chile itself
offered a rich mixture of styles. The work of the cameraman,
Miguel Joan Littin, and the art director, Rodrigo Bazaes,
had a decisive effect on the film.
How did you select the children? Was the casting particularly
difficult?
- There are no professional child actors in Chile, so
we auditioned and videoed more than 2000 children in schools,
theatre workshops, etc. We found the actors for the leading
roles only seven months before we started shooting, so
that gave us the time to rehearse them. I have very fond
memories of that.
Tell me about the music. It plays an important part
in the film, particularly in its evocation of the 70s.
- The music was written by Miguel Miranda and Miguel Tobar.
We wanted a simple but distinctive score. The original
soundtrack mixes pop songs and fragments of classical
music.
What do you think of the Chilean filmmakers - Miguel
Littin, Raúl Ruiz, Patricio Guzman, Helvio Soto
who left the country in 1973?
- I have great respect for them. I wanted this film to
be a tribute to them.
Back
|
|